Something needs to be done about the ‘indie’ movement. Once used to describe artists not belonging to a major record label, the term ‘indie’ now represents an annoying culture of coffee, cigarettes and colorful sunglasses.

First of all, I would like to thank you (the reader) for posing such a wonderful question! To answer your question, you and I need to take a look at fashion (yes, fashion!) in the music industry. As Frank Zappa once pointed out, each new style of music was accompanied by a new fashion style. If you lived in the 70’s and put on bellbottoms and platform shoes, you were disco. If you lived in the 80’s and shoved a safety pin through your nose and bought a leather jacket, you were punk. If you lived in the 90’s and wore flannel, you were grunge.

That’s where the biggest flaw shows its face: the name. If the name were anything, ANYTHING other than ‘indie’, I would have no big beef. However, it is, so I do. ALL MUSIC IS INDEPENDENT. It doesn’t matter whose label it’s on or who created the material (even if it was a big record exec.), each original song is individual and independent. Just change the name.
A city that exemplifies all of the flaws of ‘indie’ culture is Ann Arbor, Michigan. Ann Arbor is a beautiful city with a culturally rich downtown (only if your culture is white American). On a recent visit to this city I realized that I was so surrounded by ‘indie’ people that I felt independent to not be like them!

At this point in the article, you may be feeling a full spectrum of emotions. You may be angry (because you consider yourself ‘indie’ or live in Ann Arbor); you may be joyful (because you agree with me); or you may be indifferent (because you honestly just don’t care). If you care enough to form an opinion and feel an emotion, let me guide you to a justification of the ‘indie’ scene.
The ‘indie’ movement is simply a way for white people to express their ever-changing culture. Just as we associate rap with black culture, we can now associate ‘indie’ with white culture. Just as we associate artists like Bruce Springsteen, John Mellencamp and Bob Seger with middle class, industrial workers of the 1970’s and 80’s, we are now able to associate ‘indie’ artists like The Shins and The Hives with the young people entering our Information Age workforce.

So now I pose to you (the reader) a series of questions. What does it mean to be truly independent? Is independence a state of mind or a physical entity, like a record label? Are you an independent, or are you another just another ‘indie’?
No comments:
Post a Comment